Government of Gujarat vs Shyamlal Kamu Bhil — 1300/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP040016822025
Filing Number
1300/2025
Filing Date
24-Nov-2025
Registration No
1300/2025
Registration Date
24-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, NIZAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824007250272
Police Station
NIZAR POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shyamlal Kamu Bhil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court found the accused Shyamlal Kmu Bhil guilty under IPC Section 447 and CrPC Section 145 for criminal trespass. Considering the accused's guilty plea, poor financial condition, family dependents, and first-time offense with expressed remorse, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 500 fine and 7 days simple imprisonment, emphasizing reformative rather than punitive objectives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1300/2025
The court found the accused Shyamlal Kmu Bhil guilty under IPC Section 447 and CrPC Section 145 for criminal trespass. Considering the accused's guilty plea, poor financial condition, family dependents, and first-time offense with expressed remorse, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 500 fine and 7 days simple imprisonment, emphasizing reformative rather than punitive objectives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts