PARESHBHAI NARAYANBHAI PADVI vs SHRIRAM VIJAYSINGH PADVI Advocate - D J THAKARE — 26/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 38. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJTP040007562022
Filing Number
26/2022
Filing Date
09-Dec-2022
Registration No
26/2022
Registration Date
09-Dec-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, NIZAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Last updated 10-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PARESHBHAI NARAYANBHAI PADVI
Adv. MR. R.M VALVI
-
2.RAVINDRABHAI NARAYANBHAI PADVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRIRAM VIJAYSINGH PADVI Advocate - D J THAKARE
-
2.ARJUNBHAI VIJAYSINGH PADVI
Adv. D J THAKARE
Case History
-
24-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-May-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Sep-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Aug-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jul-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jul-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Jun-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Apr-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Feb-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jan-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jan-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Nov-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Oct-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Sep-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Aug-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Jul-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jul-2023
OrderView PDF
The petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed. The court ruled that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case for relief as required under the applicable legal principles of primary facts, balance of conveniences, and irreparable loss. The court found insufficient evidence and proper documentation to support the petitioner's claims regarding land ownership and rights related to a government irrigation project in Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jul-2023
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jun-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jun-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jun-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-May-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Apr-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Apr-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Feb-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jan-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 26/2022
The petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed. The court ruled that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case for relief as required under the applicable legal principles of primary facts, balance of conveniences, and irreparable loss. The court found insufficient evidence and proper documentation to support the petitioner's claims regarding land ownership and rights related to a government irrigation project in Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts