PARESHBHAI NARAYANBHAI PADVI vs SHRIRAM VIJAYSINGH PADVI Advocate - D J THAKARE — 26/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 38,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJTP040007562022
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
26/2022
Filing Date
09-12-2022
Registration No
26/2022
Registration Date
09-12-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, NIZAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARESHBHAI NARAYANBHAI PADVI
Adv. MR. R.M VALVI
RAVINDRABHAI NARAYANBHAI PADVI
Respondent(s)
SHRIRAM VIJAYSINGH PADVI Advocate - D J THAKARE
ARJUNBHAI VIJAYSINGH PADVI
Adv. D J THAKARE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 30-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 11-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 15-09-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 29-07-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed. The court ruled that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case for relief as required under the applicable legal principles of primary facts, balance of conveniences, and irreparable loss. The court found insufficient evidence and proper documentation to support the petitioner's claims regarding land ownership and rights related to a government irrigation project in Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed. The court ruled that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case for relief as required under the applicable legal principles of primary facts, balance of conveniences, and irreparable loss. The court found insufficient evidence and proper documentation to support the petitioner's claims regarding land ownership and rights related to a government irrigation project in Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts