Government of Gujarat vs MANOJBHAI NURAJIBHAI GAMIT Advocate - N N PATEL — 2459/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP030027532025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2459/2025

Filing Date

19-12-2025

Registration No

2459/2025

Registration Date

19-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALOD

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824002251310

Police Station

VALOD POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

MANOJBHAI NURAJIBHAI GAMIT Advocate - N N PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

PLEA

28-02-2026

WARRANT OF ARREST

09-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

15-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for voluntarily confessing to the offense and expressing remorse, but imposed a lighter sentence of imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 50/- instead of the minimum mandatory punishment, considering mitigating factors such as it being the accused's first offense, family circumstances, and the precedent established in the Gujarat High Court judgment. The court found the accused guilty based on the voluntary confession and police investigation records, while also considering the accused's expressions of repentance and undertaking to refrain from similar crimes in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for voluntarily confessing to the offense and expressing remorse, but imposed a lighter sentence of imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 50/- instead of the minimum mandatory punishment, considering mitigating factors such as it being the accused's first offense, family circumstances, and the precedent established in the Gujarat High Court judgment. The court found the accused guilty based on the voluntary confession and police investigation records, while also considering the accused's expressions of repentance and undertaking to refrain from similar crimes in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VALOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case