Government of Gujarat vs MANOJBHAI NURAJIBHAI GAMIT Advocate - N N PATEL — 2459/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP030027532025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2459/2025
Filing Date
19-12-2025
Registration No
2459/2025
Registration Date
19-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VALOD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824002251310
Police Station
VALOD POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MANOJBHAI NURAJIBHAI GAMIT Advocate - N N PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLEA
WARRANT OF ARREST
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLEA | |
| 28-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 09-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 15-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for voluntarily confessing to the offense and expressing remorse, but imposed a lighter sentence of imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 50/- instead of the minimum mandatory punishment, considering mitigating factors such as it being the accused's first offense, family circumstances, and the precedent established in the Gujarat High Court judgment. The court found the accused guilty based on the voluntary confession and police investigation records, while also considering the accused's expressions of repentance and undertaking to refrain from similar crimes in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for voluntarily confessing to the offense and expressing remorse, but imposed a lighter sentence of imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 50/- instead of the minimum mandatory punishment, considering mitigating factors such as it being the accused's first offense, family circumstances, and the precedent established in the Gujarat High Court judgment. The court found the accused guilty based on the voluntary confession and police investigation records, while also considering the accused's expressions of repentance and undertaking to refrain from similar crimes in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts