Government of Gujarat vs MOHANBHAI CHHANABHAI PATEL Advocate - B M PATEL — 2404/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP030026952025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2404/2025
Filing Date
04-12-2025
Registration No
2404/2025
Registration Date
04-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VALOD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824002251353
Police Station
VALOD POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MOHANBHAI CHHANABHAI PATEL Advocate - B M PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLEA
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLEA | |
| 20-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 17-01-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 12-12-2025 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under Section 12 of the Gujarat Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act for animal cruelty, finding the voluntary confession and court statements credible. However, considering mitigating factors such as the accused's financial hardship, first offense, and family dependence, the court imposed a lighter sentence of 7 days simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 50 instead of the minimum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused under Section 12 of the Gujarat Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act for animal cruelty, finding the voluntary confession and court statements credible. However, considering mitigating factors such as the accused's financial hardship, first offense, and family dependence, the court imposed a lighter sentence of 7 days simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 50 instead of the minimum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts