Government of Gujarat vs ARJUNBHAI MAGANBHAI KOTVALIYA — 1896/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP030020432025
Filing Number
1896/2025
Filing Date
25-Aug-2025
Registration No
1896/2025
Registration Date
25-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VALOD
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824002250845
Police Station
VALOD POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ARJUNBHAI MAGANBHAI KOTVALIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Case Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the IT Act for committing an offense and sentenced him to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 50. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, expression of remorse before the court, and his status as a first-time offender to impose a lighter sentence instead of the minimum prescribed punishment, while also considering established judicial precedents on sentencing discretion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jan-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2025
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Dec-2025
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1896/2025
Case Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the IT Act for committing an offense and sentenced him to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 50. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, expression of remorse before the court, and his status as a first-time offender to impose a lighter sentence instead of the minimum prescribed punishment, while also considering established judicial precedents on sentencing discretion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts