Government of Gujarat vs ARJUNBHAI MAGANBHAI KOTVALIYA — 1443/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP030015222025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1443/2025

Filing Date

25-06-2025

Registration No

1443/2025

Registration Date

25-06-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALOD

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824002250345

Police Station

VALOD POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

ARJUNBHAI MAGANBHAI KOTVALIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

PLEA

20-02-2026

WARRANT OF ARREST

17-01-2026

WARRANT OF ARREST

12-12-2025

WARRANT OF ARREST

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for voluntarily causing hurt, considering the accused's confession, remorse expressed before the court, and commitment to abstain from similar conduct in future. Instead of imposing the minimum prescribed sentence, the court exercised leniency given the accused's status as the sole earner and family circumstances, sentencing him to imprisonment until rising from court and imposing a fine of ₹50, with 5 days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for voluntarily causing hurt, considering the accused's confession, remorse expressed before the court, and commitment to abstain from similar conduct in future. Instead of imposing the minimum prescribed sentence, the court exercised leniency given the accused's status as the sole earner and family circumstances, sentencing him to imprisonment until rising from court and imposing a fine of ₹50, with 5 days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VALOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case