Government of Gujarat vs VIVEKBHAI SURESHBHAI GAMIT — 299/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP030003082026

Filing Number

299/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

299/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALOD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824002251569

Police Station

VALOD POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIVEKBHAI SURESHBHAI GAMIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 66(1)(b) and MV Act Section 185 (drunk driving offense) based on the accused's voluntary confession and police investigation report. However, considering the accused's difficult financial circumstances, his remorse, and that this was his first offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment till rising from court and a fine of Rs. 50 instead of the statutory minimum punishment of six months imprisonment or Rs. 10,000 fine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 299/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 66(1)(b) and MV Act Section 185 (drunk driving offense) based on the accused's voluntary confession and police investigation report. However, considering the accused's difficult financial circumstances, his remorse, and that this was his first offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment till rising from court and a fine of Rs. 50 instead of the statutory minimum punishment of six months imprisonment or Rs. 10,000 fine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case