Government of Gujarat vs TEJASHBHAI MAHESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - N N PATEL — 288/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP030002972026

Filing Number

288/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

288/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALOD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824002251959

Police Station

VALOD POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TEJASHBHAI MAHESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - N N PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Vadodra Civil Court found the accused guilty under Section 66(1)(b) of the IT Act and Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for a cruelty-related offense. Despite the mandatory minimum sentence of six months imprisonment or Rs. 10,000 fine, the court imposed a lenient sentence of only a fine of Rs. 50, considering the accused's first-time offense, family hardship, remorse expressed before the court, and commitment to reform. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 288/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Vadodra Civil Court found the accused guilty under Section 66(1)(b) of the IT Act and Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for a cruelty-related offense. Despite the mandatory minimum sentence of six months imprisonment or Rs. 10,000 fine, the court imposed a lenient sentence of only a fine of Rs. 50, considering the accused's first-time offense, family hardship, remorse expressed before the court, and commitment to reform. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case