Government of Gujarat vs TEJASHBHAI MAHESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - N N PATEL — 288/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP030002972026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

288/2026

Filing Date

21-01-2026

Registration No

288/2026

Registration Date

21-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALOD

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824002251959

Police Station

VALOD POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

TEJASHBHAI MAHESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - N N PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

PLEA

28-02-2026

WARRANT OF ARREST

16-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

21-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The Vadodra Civil Court found the accused guilty under Section 66(1)(b) of the IT Act and Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for a cruelty-related offense. Despite the mandatory minimum sentence of six months imprisonment or Rs. 10,000 fine, the court imposed a lenient sentence of only a fine of Rs. 50, considering the accused's first-time offense, family hardship, remorse expressed before the court, and commitment to reform. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Vadodra Civil Court found the accused guilty under Section 66(1)(b) of the IT Act and Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for a cruelty-related offense. Despite the mandatory minimum sentence of six months imprisonment or Rs. 10,000 fine, the court imposed a lenient sentence of only a fine of Rs. 50, considering the accused's first-time offense, family hardship, remorse expressed before the court, and commitment to reform. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VALOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case