Government of Gujarat vs KAMLESHBHAI NATVARBHAI PARMAR Advocate - N N PATEL — 232/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP030002412026

Filing Number

232/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

232/2026

Registration Date

20-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALOD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824002251925

Police Station

VALOD POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMLESHBHAI NATVARBHAI PARMAR Advocate - N N PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for a criminal offense. Considering the accused's voluntary confession, remorse expressed before the court, first-time offense, family circumstances, and precedent set by the Gujarat High Court, the court imposed a lenient sentence instead of the minimum prescribed penalty: simple imprisonment during court appearance and a fine of Rs. 50/-, with alternative imprisonment of 5 days if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 232/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for a criminal offense. Considering the accused's voluntary confession, remorse expressed before the court, first-time offense, family circumstances, and precedent set by the Gujarat High Court, the court imposed a lenient sentence instead of the minimum prescribed penalty: simple imprisonment during court appearance and a fine of Rs. 50/-, with alternative imprisonment of 5 days if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case