Government of Gujarat vs ARJUNBHAI RAMANBHAI CHAUDHARI — 222/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP030002312026
Filing Number
222/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
222/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VALOD
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824002251567
Police Station
VALOD POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ARJUNBHAI RAMANBHAI CHAUDHARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Case Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for committing an offense. Considering mitigating factors—including the accused's voluntary confession, expression of remorse before the court, assurance against future crimes, first-time offense, family dependency, and established legal precedents—the court imposed a lenient sentence instead of the statutory minimum, sentencing the accused to simple imprisonment during court appearance and imposing a fine of Rs. 50, with 5 days additional imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 222/2026
Case Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for committing an offense. Considering mitigating factors—including the accused's voluntary confession, expression of remorse before the court, assurance against future crimes, first-time offense, family dependency, and established legal precedents—the court imposed a lenient sentence instead of the statutory minimum, sentencing the accused to simple imprisonment during court appearance and imposing a fine of Rs. 50, with 5 days additional imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts