Government of Gujarat vs ARJUNBHAI RAMANBHAI CHAUDHARI — 222/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP030002312026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

222/2026

Filing Date

20-01-2026

Registration No

222/2026

Registration Date

20-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALOD

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824002251567

Police Station

VALOD POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

ARJUNBHAI RAMANBHAI CHAUDHARI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

PLEA

28-02-2026

WARRANT OF ARREST

07-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

20-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for committing an offense. Considering mitigating factors—including the accused's voluntary confession, expression of remorse before the court, assurance against future crimes, first-time offense, family dependency, and established legal precedents—the court imposed a lenient sentence instead of the statutory minimum, sentencing the accused to simple imprisonment during court appearance and imposing a fine of Rs. 50, with 5 days additional imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for committing an offense. Considering mitigating factors—including the accused's voluntary confession, expression of remorse before the court, assurance against future crimes, first-time offense, family dependency, and established legal precedents—the court imposed a lenient sentence instead of the statutory minimum, sentencing the accused to simple imprisonment during court appearance and imposing a fine of Rs. 50, with 5 days additional imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VALOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case