Government of Gujarat vs ARJUNBHAI RAMANBHAI CHAUDHARI — 222/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP030002312026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
222/2026
Filing Date
20-01-2026
Registration No
222/2026
Registration Date
20-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VALOD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824002251567
Police Station
VALOD POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ARJUNBHAI RAMANBHAI CHAUDHARI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLEA
WARRANT OF ARREST
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLEA | |
| 28-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 07-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 20-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for committing an offense. Considering mitigating factors—including the accused's voluntary confession, expression of remorse before the court, assurance against future crimes, first-time offense, family dependency, and established legal precedents—the court imposed a lenient sentence instead of the statutory minimum, sentencing the accused to simple imprisonment during court appearance and imposing a fine of Rs. 50, with 5 days additional imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for committing an offense. Considering mitigating factors—including the accused's voluntary confession, expression of remorse before the court, assurance against future crimes, first-time offense, family dependency, and established legal precedents—the court imposed a lenient sentence instead of the statutory minimum, sentencing the accused to simple imprisonment during court appearance and imposing a fine of Rs. 50, with 5 days additional imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts