Government of Gujarat vs TEJASBHAI MAHESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - N N PATEL — 207/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP030002162026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
207/2026
Filing Date
19-01-2026
Registration No
207/2026
Registration Date
19-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VALOD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824002251450
Police Station
VALOD POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
TEJASBHAI MAHESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - N N PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLEA
WARRANT OF ARREST
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLEA | |
| 28-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 06-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 19-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for the crime and sentenced him to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 50, while considering mitigating circumstances such as his financial hardship, first-time offence, dependents, remorse shown before court, and precedent set by the Gujarat High Court for imposing lighter sentences. The court imposed the lighter punishment rather than the statutory minimum sentence to balance justice while accounting for the accused's difficult circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for the crime and sentenced him to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 50, while considering mitigating circumstances such as his financial hardship, first-time offence, dependents, remorse shown before court, and precedent set by the Gujarat High Court for imposing lighter sentences. The court imposed the lighter punishment rather than the statutory minimum sentence to balance justice while accounting for the accused's difficult circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts