Government of Gujarat vs TEJASBHAI MAHESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - N N PATEL — 207/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP030002162026

Filing Number

207/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

207/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALOD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11824002251450

Police Station

VALOD POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TEJASBHAI MAHESHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - N N PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for the crime and sentenced him to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 50, while considering mitigating circumstances such as his financial hardship, first-time offence, dependents, remorse shown before court, and precedent set by the Gujarat High Court for imposing lighter sentences. The court imposed the lighter punishment rather than the statutory minimum sentence to balance justice while accounting for the accused's difficult circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 207/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 66(1)(b) for the crime and sentenced him to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 50, while considering mitigating circumstances such as his financial hardship, first-time offence, dependents, remorse shown before court, and precedent set by the Gujarat High Court for imposing lighter sentences. The court imposed the lighter punishment rather than the statutory minimum sentence to balance justice while accounting for the accused's difficult circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case