AAISHANI W/O DHAIYA PARIKH AND D/O RAJIVKUMAR JANAKRAISHAH vs DHAIRYA PALLAV PARIKH Advocate - H K PANWALA — 261/2024
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 144,. Status: EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJTP020045982024
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
261/2024
Filing Date
29-11-2024
Registration No
261/2024
Registration Date
29-11-2024
Court
CIVIL COURT, VYARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AAISHANI W/O DHAIYA PARIKH AND D/O RAJIVKUMAR JANAKRAISHAH
Adv. P J JOSHI
Respondent(s)
DHAIRYA PALLAV PARIKH Advocate - H K PANWALA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 25-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the applicant's interim maintenance application filed under Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicant, who has been residing separately for approximately one year and is well-educated with professional qualifications, was found capable of maintaining herself independently based on her bank statements showing substantial spending. The court noted the case is nearing completion with final disposal expected within months and declined to award interim maintenance, finding no reason to do so when the applicant can wait for the final judgment. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the applicant's interim maintenance application filed under Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicant, who has been residing separately for approximately one year and is well-educated with professional qualifications, was found capable of maintaining herself independently based on her bank statements showing substantial spending. The court noted the case is nearing completion with final disposal expected within months and declined to award interim maintenance, finding no reason to do so when the applicant can wait for the final judgment. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts