JYOTIBEN YOGESHBHAI RAJPUT vs COLLECTOR SAHEBSHRI, TAPI Advocate - DGP — 47/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 80(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 06th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJTP020043912025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
47/2025
Filing Date
26-12-2025
Registration No
47/2025
Registration Date
26-12-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, VYARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JYOTIBEN YOGESHBHAI RAJPUT
Adv. N S PRADHAN
Respondent(s)
COLLECTOR SAHEBSHRI, TAPI Advocate - DGP
NAYAB COLLECTOR AND PUNH VASHVAT V KHAS JAMIN SAMPADAN ADHIKARI,
Adv. DGP
KARYAPALAK EJNER SHRI,
Adv. DGP
MAMLATDAR SAHEB NIZAR
Adv. DGP
CIRCLE OFFICERSHRI NIZAR
Adv. DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | REPLY | |
| 28-02-2026 | REPLY | |
| 25-02-2026 | REPLY | |
| 18-02-2026 | REPLY |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The court disposed of the suit in favor of the plaintiff, Ms. Jyotiben Yogeshbhai Rajput, after the defendants admitted to issuing notices due to technical error without proper verification and acknowledged that no encroachment existed on the plaintiff's land. The court directed that if future action is taken against the plaintiff, defendants must provide 15 days' notice and follow Supreme Court guidelines, while also directing the District Collector to take action against erring officials responsible for the unnecessary inconvenience caused to tribal citizens. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The court disposed of the suit in favor of the plaintiff, Ms. Jyotiben Yogeshbhai Rajput, after the defendants admitted to issuing notices due to technical error without proper verification and acknowledged that no encroachment existed on the plaintiff's land. The court directed that if future action is taken against the plaintiff, defendants must provide 15 days' notice and follow Supreme Court guidelines, while also directing the District Collector to take action against erring officials responsible for the unnecessary inconvenience caused to tribal citizens. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts