TEJALBEN W/O PRIYANK DARSHANKUMAR RANA D/O GANESHBHAI NAGINBHAI RANA vs PRIYANK DARSHNKUMAR RANA — 252/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 144(3). Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 24th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJTP020038502025
Filing Number
252/2025
Filing Date
13-Nov-2025
Registration No
252/2025
Registration Date
13-Nov-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, VYARA
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TEJALBEN W/O PRIYANK DARSHANKUMAR RANA D/O GANESHBHAI NAGINBHAI RANA
Adv. N.S.PRADHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRIYANK DARSHNKUMAR RANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Order
Summary: In CRMA J. No. 252/2025, the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Tapi @ Vyara granted the applicant's withdrawal petition dated 24th March 2026. The court permitted the applicant to withdraw the application as she expressed her unwillingness to proceed further, and disposed of the case accordingly with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Notice To Opponents
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Notice To Opponents
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Notice To Opponents
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Notice To Opponents
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 252/2025
Summary: In CRMA J. No. 252/2025, the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Tapi @ Vyara granted the applicant's withdrawal petition dated 24th March 2026. The court permitted the applicant to withdraw the application as she expressed her unwillingness to proceed further, and disposed of the case accordingly with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts