ISMAIL ALBAD ALISAR vs KHAN SHAKIL KHAN SALIM Advocate - Z H VAKHARIYA, P A GAMIT — 2066/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Status: EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT. Next hearing: 16th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJTP020023182023
Next Hearing
16th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2066/2023
Filing Date
01-07-2023
Registration No
2066/2023
Registration Date
01-07-2023
Court
CIVIL COURT, VYARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ISMAIL ALBAD ALISAR
Adv. N S PRADHAN
Respondent(s)
KHAN SHAKIL KHAN SALIM Advocate - Z H VAKHARIYA, P A GAMIT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT
EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT
EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT
EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT
EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT | |
| 25-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT | |
| 28-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT | |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the accused's application dated 17.02.2025 in Criminal Case No. 2066 of 2023, finding it wholly misconceived and filed solely to delay trial. The counsel for the accused failed to cite any legal provision or precedent supporting the application and did not comply with a previous court order dated 10.01.2025. Costs of Rs. 10,000 were imposed on the accused, to be credited to the State Exchequer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the accused's application dated 17.02.2025 in Criminal Case No. 2066 of 2023, finding it wholly misconceived and filed solely to delay trial. The counsel for the accused failed to cite any legal provision or precedent supporting the application and did not comply with a previous court order dated 10.01.2025. Costs of Rs. 10,000 were imposed on the accused, to be credited to the State Exchequer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts