MITAL JIVANBHAI KORADIA W/O MUKESHBHAI BHALANI vs SANJAYBHAI JIVANBHAI KORADIA Advocate - K S PRADHAN — 10/2025

Case under Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 6,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJTP020010452025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

03rd April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

10/2025

Filing Date

06-03-2025

Registration No

10/2025

Registration Date

06-03-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, VYARA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Acts & Sections

HINDU SUCCESSION ACT, 1956 Section 6,
SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 34,37,

Petitioner(s)

MITAL JIVANBHAI KORADIA W/O MUKESHBHAI BHALANI

Adv. D D ANDHARIA

Respondent(s)

SANJAYBHAI JIVANBHAI KORADIA Advocate - K S PRADHAN

MANISHBHAI JIVANBHAI KORADIA

Adv. N S PRADHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

05-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

05-02-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

13-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

08-12-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

29-11-2025

ISSUES

Interim Orders

29-11-2025
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's interim relief application in a partition suit filed by a daughter against her two brothers over parental properties in Gujarat. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, citing inconsistencies between her pleadings and documentary evidence, including the existence of a family arrangement deed dated 2003 and a will from 2004, both of which she initially claimed were unknown to her. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's interim relief application in a partition suit filed by a daughter against her two brothers over parental properties in Gujarat. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, citing inconsistencies between her pleadings and documentary evidence, including the existence of a family arrangement deed dated 2003 and a will from 2004, both of which she initially claimed were unknown to her. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, VYARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case