MITAL JIVANBHAI KORADIA W/O MUKESHBHAI BHALANI vs SANJAYBHAI JIVANBHAI KORADIA Advocate - K S PRADHAN — 10/2025
Case under Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 6,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJTP020010452025
Next Hearing
03rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
10/2025
Filing Date
06-03-2025
Registration No
10/2025
Registration Date
06-03-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, VYARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MITAL JIVANBHAI KORADIA W/O MUKESHBHAI BHALANI
Adv. D D ANDHARIA
Respondent(s)
SANJAYBHAI JIVANBHAI KORADIA Advocate - K S PRADHAN
MANISHBHAI JIVANBHAI KORADIA
Adv. N S PRADHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
ISSUES
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 05-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 13-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 08-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 29-11-2025 | ISSUES |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's interim relief application in a partition suit filed by a daughter against her two brothers over parental properties in Gujarat. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, citing inconsistencies between her pleadings and documentary evidence, including the existence of a family arrangement deed dated 2003 and a will from 2004, both of which she initially claimed were unknown to her. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's interim relief application in a partition suit filed by a daughter against her two brothers over parental properties in Gujarat. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, citing inconsistencies between her pleadings and documentary evidence, including the existence of a family arrangement deed dated 2003 and a will from 2004, both of which she initially claimed were unknown to her. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts