Government of Gujarat vs SATISHBHAI BABUBHAI GAMIT — 303/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP020004272026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-12-2025

Filing Number

303/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

303/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, VYARA

Judge

2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

2049

Police Station

VYARA POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SATISHBHAI BABUBHAI GAMIT

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

PLEA

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Court Decision Summary Criminal Case No. 303/2026 (Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vyara) The court convicted the accused under both the IPC Section 185 (driving under alcohol influence) and the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b), sentencing him to 6 months imprisonment and/or a fine of Rs. 1,000, with additional sentencing under Section 128 CrPC. The court found the accused voluntarily admitted to consuming alcohol in public without a permit, rejected his claims of no prior offense due to poverty, and determined that while the IPC offense alone would be non-cognizable, the Prohibition Act charge renders the combined case cognizable and triable by the Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary Criminal Case No. 303/2026 (Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vyara) The court convicted the accused under both the IPC Section 185 (driving under alcohol influence) and the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b), sentencing him to 6 months imprisonment and/or a fine of Rs. 1,000, with additional sentencing under Section 128 CrPC. The court found the accused voluntarily admitted to consuming alcohol in public without a permit, rejected his claims of no prior offense due to poverty, and determined that while the IPC offense alone would be non-cognizable, the Prohibition Act charge renders the combined case cognizable and triable by the Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, VYARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case