Government of Gujarat vs SAYRESHBHAI NAVINBHAI GAMIT — 301/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJTP020004252026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

17-01-2026

Filing Number

301/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

301/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, VYARA

Judge

2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

2191

Police Station

VYARA POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SAYRESHBHAI NAVINBHAI GAMIT

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

PLEA

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary Criminal Case No. 301/2026 | Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vyara, Tapi District The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 185 (driving under alcohol influence) and Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b), sentencing him to 6 months imprisonment with Rs. 1,000 fine, or 7 days additional imprisonment if fine is unpaid. The court rejected the accused's plea for leniency citing first-time offender status and economic hardship, holding that driving while intoxicated without valid permit is a serious offense affecting public safety, and imposed the minimum prescribed sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Criminal Case No. 301/2026 | Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vyara, Tapi District The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 185 (driving under alcohol influence) and Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b), sentencing him to 6 months imprisonment with Rs. 1,000 fine, or 7 days additional imprisonment if fine is unpaid. The court rejected the accused's plea for leniency citing first-time offender status and economic hardship, holding that driving while intoxicated without valid permit is a serious offense affecting public safety, and imposed the minimum prescribed sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, VYARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case