CHANDRA SINGH A/O STATE BANK OF INDIA VYARA BRANCH vs KUSUM KESHAV GAVIT — 45/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJTP020003612026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

45/2026

Filing Date

16-02-2026

Registration No

45/2026

Registration Date

16-02-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, VYARA

Judge

2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002 Section 14,

Petitioner(s)

CHANDRA SINGH A/O STATE BANK OF INDIA VYARA BRANCH

Adv. R A MEHTA

Respondent(s)

KUSUM KESHAV GAVIT

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

12-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

26-02-2026

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Tapi at Vyara allowed State Bank of India's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 to take possession of a secured asset (Row House No. 8 at Royal Park, Uchchhal) from the defaulting borrower Mr. Kusum Keshav Gavit. The court found that SBI satisfied all statutory requirements including proper notice and affidavit compliance, and appointed a Court Commissioner to execute the possession order within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Tapi at Vyara allowed State Bank of India's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 to take possession of a secured asset (Row House No. 8 at Royal Park, Uchchhal) from the defaulting borrower Mr. Kusum Keshav Gavit. The court found that SBI satisfied all statutory requirements including proper notice and affidavit compliance, and appointed a Court Commissioner to execute the possession order within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, VYARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case