PRAVINBHAI THAGABHAI URFE THAGLABHAIN GAMIT vs GOVINDBHAI JAMSINHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - M F CHAUDHARI — 3/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,37,38,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJTP020003422025
Next Hearing
03rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3/2025
Filing Date
24-01-2025
Registration No
3/2025
Registration Date
24-01-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, VYARA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRAVINBHAI THAGABHAI URFE THAGLABHAIN GAMIT
Adv. D R GAMIT
Respondent(s)
GOVINDBHAI JAMSINHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - M F CHAUDHARI
L/H OF LATE GAMLIBEN D/O JAMSIBHAI AND W/O FAKIRBHAI GAMIT(Legal Heir)
SHAKUNTALABEN D/O THAGLABHAI AND W/O UKABHAI GAMIT
Adv. A A VALVI
ARVINDBHAI THAGLABHAI GAMIT
Adv. A A VALVI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
ISSUES
ISSUES
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 05-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 20-12-2025 | ISSUES | |
| 05-12-2025 | ISSUES |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for interim relief in a civil suit seeking partition of agricultural land among co-heirs. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he did not provide documentary evidence (land revenue receipts, retirement details, or cultivation proof) to support his claims, and customary law regarding inheritance rights among the Adivasi community requires formal evidence at trial, not merely at the interim stage. The application was dismissed with no orders as to costs, pending the final hearing of the main partition suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for interim relief in a civil suit seeking partition of agricultural land among co-heirs. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he did not provide documentary evidence (land revenue receipts, retirement details, or cultivation proof) to support his claims, and customary law regarding inheritance rights among the Adivasi community requires formal evidence at trial, not merely at the interim stage. The application was dismissed with no orders as to costs, pending the final hearing of the main partition suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts