PRAVINBHAI THAGABHAI URFE THAGLABHAIN GAMIT vs GOVINDBHAI JAMSINHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - M F CHAUDHARI — 3/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,37,38. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 03-Apr-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJTP020003422025

Filing Number

3/2025

Filing Date

24-Jan-2025

Registration No

3/2025

Registration Date

24-Jan-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, VYARA

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,37,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAVINBHAI THAGABHAI URFE THAGLABHAIN GAMIT

    Adv. D R GAMIT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVINDBHAI JAMSINHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - M F CHAUDHARI

  2. 2.L/H OF LATE GAMLIBEN D/O JAMSIBHAI AND W/O FAKIRBHAI GAMIT(Legal Heir)

  3. 3.SHAKUNTALABEN D/O THAGLABHAI AND W/O UKABHAI GAMIT

    Adv. A A VALVI

  4. 4.ARVINDBHAI THAGLABHAI GAMIT

    Adv. A A VALVI

Case History

  1. 03-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  3. 05-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 20-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 05-Dec-2025

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for interim relief in a civil suit seeking partition of agricultural land among co-heirs. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he did not provide documentary evidence (land revenue receipts, retirement details, or cultivation proof) to support his claims, and customary law regarding inheritance rights among the Adivasi community requires formal evidence at trial, not merely at the interim stage. The application was dismissed with no orders as to costs, pending the final hearing of the main partition suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 05-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  8. 28-Nov-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  9. 21-Nov-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  10. 07-Nov-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  11. 29-Oct-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  12. 10-Oct-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  13. 01-Oct-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  14. 16-Sep-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  15. 29-Aug-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  16. 06-Aug-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  17. 18-Jul-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  18. 03-Jul-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  19. 13-Jun-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  20. 14-May-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 22-Apr-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 18-Mar-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 28-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 24-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for interim relief in a civil suit seeking partition of agricultural land among co-heirs. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he did not provide documentary evidence (land revenue receipts, retirement details, or cultivation proof) to support his claims, and customary law regarding inheritance rights among the Adivasi community requires formal evidence at trial, not merely at the interim stage. The application was dismissed with no orders as to costs, pending the final hearing of the main partition suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case