PRAVINBHAI THAGABHAI URFE THAGLABHAIN GAMIT vs GOVINDBHAI JAMSINHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - M F CHAUDHARI — 3/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,37,38,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJTP020003422025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

03rd April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3/2025

Filing Date

24-01-2025

Registration No

3/2025

Registration Date

24-01-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, VYARA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 34,37,38,

Petitioner(s)

PRAVINBHAI THAGABHAI URFE THAGLABHAIN GAMIT

Adv. D R GAMIT

Respondent(s)

GOVINDBHAI JAMSINHBHAI GAMIT Advocate - M F CHAUDHARI

L/H OF LATE GAMLIBEN D/O JAMSIBHAI AND W/O FAKIRBHAI GAMIT(Legal Heir)

SHAKUNTALABEN D/O THAGLABHAI AND W/O UKABHAI GAMIT

Adv. A A VALVI

ARVINDBHAI THAGLABHAI GAMIT

Adv. A A VALVI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

05-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

05-02-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

09-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

20-12-2025

ISSUES

05-12-2025

ISSUES

Interim Orders

05-12-2025
JUDEGEMENT

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for interim relief in a civil suit seeking partition of agricultural land among co-heirs. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he did not provide documentary evidence (land revenue receipts, retirement details, or cultivation proof) to support his claims, and customary law regarding inheritance rights among the Adivasi community requires formal evidence at trial, not merely at the interim stage. The application was dismissed with no orders as to costs, pending the final hearing of the main partition suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for interim relief in a civil suit seeking partition of agricultural land among co-heirs. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he did not provide documentary evidence (land revenue receipts, retirement details, or cultivation proof) to support his claims, and customary law regarding inheritance rights among the Adivasi community requires formal evidence at trial, not merely at the interim stage. The application was dismissed with no orders as to costs, pending the final hearing of the main partition suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, VYARA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case