Government of Gujarat vs NITESHBHAI S/O ANILBHAI BAVABHAI VALVI Advocate - U N SHAH — 25/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 78(1),78(2),79,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJTP010008862025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
23/2025
Filing Date
28-11-2025
Registration No
25/2025
Registration Date
28-11-2025
Court
DISTRICT COURT, TAPI
Judge
2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
03rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11824006250887
Police Station
UCHCHHAL POLICE STATION - TAPI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
NITESHBHAI S/O ANILBHAI BAVABHAI VALVI Advocate - U N SHAH
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 11-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Special POCSO Court in Tapi, Gujarat acquitted the accused of charges under BNS 2023 Sections 78(1), 78(2), 79 and POCSO Act Sections 11(4), 12. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the sexual harassment case beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim's testimony contradicted herself during cross-examination and key witnesses were unavailable, making the evidence circumstantial and unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Special POCSO Court in Tapi, Gujarat acquitted the accused of charges under BNS 2023 Sections 78(1), 78(2), 79 and POCSO Act Sections 11(4), 12. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the sexual harassment case beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim's testimony contradicted herself during cross-examination and key witnesses were unavailable, making the evidence circumstantial and unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts