BIKI KHAGESWAR BHUYAN vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - PP — 70/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC APPLICATION.DIST

CNR: GJTP010001892026

Filing Number

70/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

70/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, TAPI

Judge

2-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIKI KHAGESWAR BHUYAN

    Adv. R B BHAVSAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court rejected the applicant's anticipatory bail plea in a cyber fraud case involving ₹1.45 crore. The court found strong prima facie evidence of the applicant's direct involvement in an organized cyber scam operating across multiple states, with multiple FIRs lodged and co-accused already arrested. Considering the gravity of the offense, the ongoing investigation's sensitivity, the risk of witness tampering, and the applicant's key role as a "master mind," the court deemed bail inappropriate and ordered the applicant to be released on bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Order

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 70/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the applicant's anticipatory bail plea in a cyber fraud case involving ₹1.45 crore. The court found strong prima facie evidence of the applicant's direct involvement in an organized cyber scam operating across multiple states, with multiple FIRs lodged and co-accused already arrested. Considering the gravity of the offense, the ongoing investigation's sensitivity, the risk of witness tampering, and the applicant's key role as a "master mind," the court deemed bail inappropriate and ordered the applicant to be released on bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case