JYOTSANABEN NARSINHBHAI HALPATI vs AMRARAM MOHANRAM SUTHAR — 41/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 168. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJTP010001622026

Filing Number

41/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

41/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, TAPI

Judge

2-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 168

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JYOTSANABEN NARSINHBHAI HALPATI

    Adv. B J PATEL

  2. 2.SUMITBHAI NARSINHBHAI HALPATI

  3. 3.VIVEKBHAI NARSINHBHAI HALPATI

  4. 4.KANKUBEN GURABHAI HALPATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMRARAM MOHANRAM SUTHAR

  2. 2.UMARAM MOHANRAM SUTHAR

  3. 3.SBI GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Tapi, Vyara approved a compromise settlement and ordered disbursement of Rs. 19,00,000/- to four claimants. The amount was allocated as Rs. 3,80,000/- and Rs. 95,000/- to each claimant respectively, to be paid by account payee cheque and partially invested in fixed deposits for five years with restrictions on loans or encumbrances without tribunal permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 41/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Tapi, Vyara approved a compromise settlement and ordered disbursement of Rs. 19,00,000/- to four claimants. The amount was allocated as Rs. 3,80,000/- and Rs. 95,000/- to each claimant respectively, to be paid by account payee cheque and partially invested in fixed deposits for five years with restrictions on loans or encumbrances without tribunal permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case