KAMESHKUMAR ANILBHAI SHEITH vs ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO,LTD — 40/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 168. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJTP010001612026
Filing Number
40/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
40/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, TAPI
Judge
2-Addl.district & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAMESHKUMAR ANILBHAI SHEITH
Adv. R C MAHINDRAKAR
-
2.HETALBEN KAMESHKUMAR SHEITH
Respondent(s)
-
1.ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO,LTD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The MACT (Auxiliary) at Tapi approved a compromise settlement from the National Lok Adalat dated 13.12.2025 and ordered disbursement of Rs. 22,03,971/- to claimants Kameshkumar Anilbhai Sheth and Hetalben Kameshkumar Sheth. The amount was divided into three parts: Rs. 5,50,993/- each invested in fixed deposits for five years with restrictions on loans/encumbrances, and Rs. 5,50,992/- paid directly by account payee cheque. The insurance company (Royal Sundaram) consented to the payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 40/2026
Summary: The MACT (Auxiliary) at Tapi approved a compromise settlement from the National Lok Adalat dated 13.12.2025 and ordered disbursement of Rs. 22,03,971/- to claimants Kameshkumar Anilbhai Sheth and Hetalben Kameshkumar Sheth. The amount was divided into three parts: Rs. 5,50,993/- each invested in fixed deposits for five years with restrictions on loans/encumbrances, and Rs. 5,50,992/- paid directly by account payee cheque. The insurance company (Royal Sundaram) consented to the payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts