VIJAYBHAI REVAJIBHAI GAMIT vs THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD — 38/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 168. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJTP010001592026

Filing Number

38/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

38/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, TAPI

Judge

2-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 168

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYBHAI REVAJIBHAI GAMIT

    Adv. K B RATHOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxiliary) at Tapi, Vyara ordered the disbursement of Rs. 10,07,742 awarded in a motor accident claim to claimant Vijaybhai Revajibhai Gamit, with Rs. 3,01,003 paid immediately and Rs. 7,02,339 (70%) invested in a fixed deposit with a nationalized bank for 5 years under tribunal custody, with the claimant entitled to periodical interest but barred from taking loans against it without court permission. The decision implements the High Court's earlier stay order that conditioned release of the awarded amount on deposit of 100% of the sum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 38/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxiliary) at Tapi, Vyara ordered the disbursement of Rs. 10,07,742 awarded in a motor accident claim to claimant Vijaybhai Revajibhai Gamit, with Rs. 3,01,003 paid immediately and Rs. 7,02,339 (70%) invested in a fixed deposit with a nationalized bank for 5 years under tribunal custody, with the claimant entitled to periodical interest but barred from taking loans against it without court permission. The decision implements the High Court's earlier stay order that conditioned release of the awarded amount on deposit of 100% of the sum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case