VASANTI FOTU MAVALI vs ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD — 37/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 168. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJTP010001512026

Filing Number

37/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

37/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, TAPI

Judge

2-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 168

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VASANTI FOTU MAVALI

    Adv. A L GAMIT

  2. 2.FOTU SARJAYA MAVALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

    The MACT (Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal) at Tapi, Vyara approved a compromise settlement and ordered disbursement of Rs. 12,52,840 deposited by ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. The amount was divided: Rs. 3,13,210 each to be invested in 5-year fixed deposits for claimants Vasanti Photu Mavli and Photu Sarjya Mavli (with no-loan restrictions), and Rs. 3,13,210 each paid directly to them via account payee cheques. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 37/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The MACT (Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal) at Tapi, Vyara approved a compromise settlement and ordered disbursement of Rs. 12,52,840 deposited by ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. The amount was divided: Rs. 3,13,210 each to be invested in 5-year fixed deposits for claimants Vasanti Photu Mavli and Photu Sarjya Mavli (with no-loan restrictions), and Rs. 3,13,210 each paid directly to them via account payee cheques. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case