MAHMAD HANIF GULAM RASUL SHEKH vs SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO.LTD — 155/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Status: Order On Urgent Hearing. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJSR190016662025
Filing Number
155/2025
Filing Date
08-Dec-2025
Registration No
155/2025
Registration Date
08-Dec-2025
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
2-5th Addl District Judge
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHMAD HANIF GULAM RASUL SHEKH
Adv. S A SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO.LTD
Case History
-
17-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
Order On Urgent Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
20-Mar-2026
Order On Urgent Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Order On Urgent Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary: The appellate court granted bail to the appellant, who was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act with a 2-year imprisonment sentence and ordered to pay Rs. 1,10,000 compensation. The sentence is suspended during the appeal pendency under Section 430(1) of BNSS. The appellant must furnish a surety bond of Rs. 50,000, pay 20% of the compensation (Rs. 22,000) within 60 days, and appear regularly before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 155/2025
Summary: The appellate court granted bail to the appellant, who was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act with a 2-year imprisonment sentence and ordered to pay Rs. 1,10,000 compensation. The sentence is suspended during the appeal pendency under Section 430(1) of BNSS. The appellant must furnish a surety bond of Rs. 50,000, pay 20% of the compensation (Rs. 22,000) within 60 days, and appear regularly before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts