Government of Gujarat vs ANMOL S/O SUKHNANDI SHAHU Advocate - M P VANKAR — 37/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366,376(2)(N),376(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th March 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJSR190014482023
Filing Number
37/2023
Filing Date
08-Nov-2023
Registration No
37/2023
Registration Date
08-Nov-2023
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-3rd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214023220528
Police Station
KADODARA GIDC POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANMOL S/O SUKHNANDI SHAHU Advocate - M P VANKAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Amol Sukhandi Shah, of all charges under the POCSO Act 2012 and IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(a), and 376(3). The court found that while the victim was above 18 years old at the time of the alleged offense, she willingly eloped with the accused, married him, and bore his child—facts inconsistent with the prosecution's charges of abduction, rape, and sexual offenses against a minor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Judgement
3rd Addl District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Further Statement
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
01-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
13-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
03-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
22-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
04-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
11-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
25-Oct-2024
Framing Of Charge/Plea
5th Addl District Judge
-
30-Aug-2024
Process To Accused
6th Addl District Judge
-
12-Jul-2024
Process To Accused
6th Addl District Judge
-
07-Jun-2024
Process To Accused
6th Addl District Judge
-
06-May-2024
Process To Accused
8th Addl District Judge
-
14-Mar-2024
Process To Accused
8th Addl District Judge
-
31-Jan-2024
Process To Accused
8th Addl District Judge
-
30-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Nov-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 37/2023
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Amol Sukhandi Shah, of all charges under the POCSO Act 2012 and IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(a), and 376(3). The court found that while the victim was above 18 years old at the time of the alleged offense, she willingly eloped with the accused, married him, and bore his child—facts inconsistent with the prosecution's charges of abduction, rape, and sexual offenses against a minor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts