Government of Gujarat vs ANMOL S/O SUKHNANDI SHAHU Advocate - M P VANKAR — 37/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366,376(2)(N),376(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th March 2026.

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO

CNR: GJSR190014482023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

37/2023

Filing Date

08-11-2023

Registration No

37/2023

Registration Date

08-11-2023

Court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214023220528

Police Station

KADODARA GIDC POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 363,366,376(2)(N),376(3)
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 Section 6,5(L),5(J)2,4,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

ANMOL S/O SUKHNANDI SHAHU Advocate - M P VANKAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

24-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

18-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

13-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Amol Sukhandi Shah, of all charges under the POCSO Act 2012 and IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(a), and 376(3). The court found that while the victim was above 18 years old at the time of the alleged offense, she willingly eloped with the accused, married him, and bore his child—facts inconsistent with the prosecution's charges of abduction, rape, and sexual offenses against a minor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Amol Sukhandi Shah, of all charges under the POCSO Act 2012 and IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(a), and 376(3). The court found that while the victim was above 18 years old at the time of the alleged offense, she willingly eloped with the accused, married him, and bore his child—facts inconsistent with the prosecution's charges of abduction, rape, and sexual offenses against a minor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case