Government of Gujarat vs AALOK S/O RANDHIR PASVAN(Absconding) Advocate - J S PAREKH — 91/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366,376(2)(J)(K),(N),116(B),114,. Status: EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO

CNR: GJSR190013062022

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Next Hearing

23rd March 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

90/2022

Filing Date

03-11-2022

Registration No

91/2022

Registration Date

03-11-2022

Court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 363,366,376(2)(J)(K),(N),116(B),114,
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 Section 6,4,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

AALOK S/O RANDHIR PASVAN(Absconding) Advocate - J S PAREKH

RITESH ALIASH RAJNATH RAY

Adv. J S PAREKH

BABALKUMAR NAGENDR GIRI

Adv. T P JAIN

HEMANT ALIASH RAJ ALIASH NIRNJAN BISHOI

Adv. T P JAIN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

17-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

27-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

07-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

20-12-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Interim Orders

17-02-2026
ORDER

The trial of accused no.4 (Hemant @ Raj s/o. Niranjan Bishoi) in POCSO Case No.91/2022 has been separated from the main case and ordered to be proceeded as a new case. The court took this step to expedite the trial of accused nos.2 and 3, as accused no.4 remained absent and the non-bailable warrant against him could not be executed. Upon arrest of accused no.4, proceedings against him will continue in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The trial of accused no.4 (Hemant @ Raj s/o. Niranjan Bishoi) in POCSO Case No.91/2022 has been separated from the main case and ordered to be proceeded as a new case. The court took this step to expedite the trial of accused nos.2 and 3, as accused no.4 remained absent and the non-bailable warrant against him could not be executed. Upon arrest of accused no.4, proceedings against him will continue in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case