RASHMINA HIRENKUMAR PATEL vs NIMESHBHAI HARISHBHAI SHAH Advocate - A P PARMAR — 100/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397,. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th March 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJSR190011102025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100/2025
Filing Date
02-08-2025
Registration No
100/2025
Registration Date
02-08-2025
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RASHMINA HIRENKUMAR PATEL
Adv. Y P SHAH
Respondent(s)
NIMESHBHAI HARISHBHAI SHAH Advocate - A P PARMAR
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 21-02-2026 | ORDER | |
| 10-02-2026 | ORDER | |
| 10-02-2026 | ORDER | |
| 10-02-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge at Surat, Bardoli dismissed a Criminal Revision Application challenging a summoning order in a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that a partner in a firm cannot escape criminal liability merely by not signing the cheque or claiming to be a "sleeping partner"—both partners share joint and several liability for firm transactions, and the defenses raised are matters of evidence for trial, not grounds for quashing at the summoning stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge at Surat, Bardoli dismissed a Criminal Revision Application challenging a summoning order in a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that a partner in a firm cannot escape criminal liability merely by not signing the cheque or claiming to be a "sleeping partner"—both partners share joint and several liability for firm transactions, and the defenses raised are matters of evidence for trial, not grounds for quashing at the summoning stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts