Government of Gujarat vs SHYAM SURESHBAHI MAHADU SAVNT(RAJPUT) Advocate - C B DESAI — 72/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJSR190006942022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
8/2022
Filing Date
13-06-2022
Registration No
72/2022
Registration Date
13-06-2022
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214020220397
Police Station
KADODARA GIDC POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHYAM SURESHBAHI MAHADU SAVNT(RAJPUT) Advocate - C B DESAI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 20-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 09-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 03-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The Special POCSO Court acquitted Shyam Sureshbhai Mahadu Savant of all charges under sections 363, 366 IPC, SC-ST Act, and POCSO Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove the victim's minority status and that there was no actual abduction—the victim's own testimony revealed she voluntarily accompanied the accused after they met while both worked at a factory. The court noted significant contradictions between the victim's police statement and court testimony, the lack of proper documentary evidence of age, and the absence of any corroborating investigation in Ahmedabad. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Judgment Summary The Special POCSO Court acquitted Shyam Sureshbhai Mahadu Savant of all charges under sections 363, 366 IPC, SC-ST Act, and POCSO Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove the victim's minority status and that there was no actual abduction—the victim's own testimony revealed she voluntarily accompanied the accused after they met while both worked at a factory. The court noted significant contradictions between the victim's police statement and court testimony, the lack of proper documentary evidence of age, and the absence of any corroborating investigation in Ahmedabad. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts