Government of Gujarat vs SHYAM SURESHBAHI MAHADU SAVNT(RAJPUT) Advocate - C B DESAI — 72/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJSR190006942022
Filing Number
8/2022
Filing Date
13-Jun-2022
Registration No
72/2022
Registration Date
13-Jun-2022
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-3rd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214020220397
Police Station
KADODARA GIDC POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHYAM SURESHBAHI MAHADU SAVNT(RAJPUT) Advocate - C B DESAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Judegement
Court Judgment Summary The Special POCSO Court acquitted Shyam Sureshbhai Mahadu Savant of all charges under sections 363, 366 IPC, SC-ST Act, and POCSO Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove the victim's minority status and that there was no actual abduction—the victim's own testimony revealed she voluntarily accompanied the accused after they met while both worked at a factory. The court noted significant contradictions between the victim's police statement and court testimony, the lack of proper documentary evidence of age, and the absence of any corroborating investigation in Ahmedabad. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl District Judge
-
20-Mar-2026
Judgement
3rd Addl District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Further Statement
3rd Addl District Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Further Statement
3rd Addl District Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
02-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
26-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
05-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
19-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
10-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
28-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
09-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
23-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
24-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
10-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
16-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
19-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
26-Oct-2023
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
21-Sep-2023
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
17-Aug-2023
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
27-Jul-2023
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
26-Jun-2023
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
25-May-2023
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
27-Apr-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
17-Mar-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
15-Feb-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
10-Jan-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
12-Dec-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
18-Nov-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
20-Oct-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
15-Sep-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
30-Aug-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
8th Addl District Judge
-
12-Aug-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
8th Addl District Judge
-
26-Jul-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
8th Addl District Judge
-
11-Jul-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
8th Addl District Judge
-
27-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 72/2022
Court Judgment Summary The Special POCSO Court acquitted Shyam Sureshbhai Mahadu Savant of all charges under sections 363, 366 IPC, SC-ST Act, and POCSO Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove the victim's minority status and that there was no actual abduction—the victim's own testimony revealed she voluntarily accompanied the accused after they met while both worked at a factory. The court noted significant contradictions between the victim's police statement and court testimony, the lack of proper documentary evidence of age, and the absence of any corroborating investigation in Ahmedabad. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts