RAJIVSINH ALIAS RAJUBIHARI SURANJANSINH vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 231/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th April 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR190003602026
Filing Number
231/2026
Filing Date
20-Mar-2026
Registration No
231/2026
Registration Date
20-Mar-2026
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
2-5th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214023252172
Police Station
KADODARA GIDC POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJIVSINH ALIAS RAJUBIHARI SURANJANSINH
Adv. R T BHOI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case 231/2026 Summary: The court rejected Rajivsinh's bail application under Section 439 CrPC for charges involving illegal firearms possession and supply under the Arms Act. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused actively supplied a country-made pistol and 9 cartridges to another accused, establishing his material role in the offense, and noted five serious offenses against him indicating habitual criminal behavior and flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
5th Addl District Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Order
5th Addl District Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Order
5th Addl District Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 231/2026
Case 231/2026 Summary: The court rejected Rajivsinh's bail application under Section 439 CrPC for charges involving illegal firearms possession and supply under the Arms Act. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused actively supplied a country-made pistol and 9 cartridges to another accused, establishing his material role in the offense, and noted five serious offenses against him indicating habitual criminal behavior and flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts