NIKHILSINGH RAMESHSINGH RAJPUT vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 196/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR190002962026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
196/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
196/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214023252185
Police Station
KADODARA GIDC POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NIKHILSINGH RAMESHSINGH RAJPUT
Adv. S L VAGH
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted bail to Nikhilsingh Rameshsingh Rajput, a 22-year-old labor worker accused of mobile and cash snatching under Sections 309(4), 352, and 54 of BNS. The court found that the applicant was not named in the original FIR, co-accused persons were already released on bail with similar roles, the investigation was complete, and prolonged detention served no purpose, applying the principle that "bail is a rule and jail is an exception." Bail was granted on a surety bond of Rs. 50,000 with stringent conditions including prohibition on witness intimidation, travel restrictions, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted bail to Nikhilsingh Rameshsingh Rajput, a 22-year-old labor worker accused of mobile and cash snatching under Sections 309(4), 352, and 54 of BNS. The court found that the applicant was not named in the original FIR, co-accused persons were already released on bail with similar roles, the investigation was complete, and prolonged detention served no purpose, applying the principle that "bail is a rule and jail is an exception." Bail was granted on a surety bond of Rs. 50,000 with stringent conditions including prohibition on witness intimidation, travel restrictions, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts