ASHOKBHAI ALIAS ASHOK DAMAR SHANKARBHAI DHO.PATEL vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 193/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR190002932026

Filing Number

193/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

193/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

2-5th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214031230916

Police Station

MAHUVA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E),81,116(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOKBHAI ALIAS ASHOK DAMAR SHANKARBHAI DHO.PATEL

    Adv. A S PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    The court rejected the bail petition of Ashokbhai (Criminal Bail Application No. 193/2026) filed under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The applicant was charged under the Prohibition Act for supplying liquor to a co-accused, and the court found that he had a criminal history, posed a flight risk, and played an active role in the offense, making him unsuitable for bail at that stage of the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 193/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail petition of Ashokbhai (Criminal Bail Application No. 193/2026) filed under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The applicant was charged under the Prohibition Act for supplying liquor to a co-accused, and the court found that he had a criminal history, posed a flight risk, and played an active role in the offense, making him unsuitable for bail at that stage of the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case