GAFFARKHAN ALIAS ABDUL GAFFARKHAN RAJEKHAN PATHAN vs Government of Gujarat — 189/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR190002882026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

189/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

189/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214031260003

Police Station

MAHUVA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 115(2),118(1),352,351(3),54,118(2),
SCHEDULED CASTS AND THE SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF TROCITIES) ACT, 1989 Section 3(1)RS,3(2)5-A,3(2)5

Petitioner(s)

GAFFARKHAN ALIAS ABDUL GAFFARKHAN RAJEKHAN PATHAN

Adv. A S SAIYAD

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat

Hearing History

Judge: 2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

09-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Surat granted the petitioner's application under CrPC Section 497 to recover his seized Honda motorcycle during trial proceedings. The court found that the petitioner is the legal owner of the vehicle (as registered with RTO), the police investigation was complete, and the vehicle poses no ongoing evidentiary necessity; therefore, custody could be returned subject to strict conditions including non-transfer, production when required, photographs documentation, and prohibition against criminal use. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Surat granted the petitioner's application under CrPC Section 497 to recover his seized Honda motorcycle during trial proceedings. The court found that the petitioner is the legal owner of the vehicle (as registered with RTO), the police investigation was complete, and the vehicle poses no ongoing evidentiary necessity; therefore, custody could be returned subject to strict conditions including non-transfer, production when required, photographs documentation, and prohibition against criminal use. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case