BALBIR RAMKHILAVI KHATIK vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 188/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR190002832026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
188/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
188/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BALBIR RAMKHILAVI KHATIK
Adv. P I JODHPURIYA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court in Bardoli, Surat granted bail to the accused Balbir Ramkhiladi Khatik in Criminal Bail Application No. 188/2026. The accused was charged under IPC Sections 306 and 54 for allegedly committing theft of yarn worth approximately ten lakhs from a storage room in Vadodra village along with co-accused Hansraj Durjan Singh. Although the prosecution argued the case was serious with incriminating evidence, the court found no sufficient reason to keep the accused in judicial custody pending trial, considering the case requires substantial time for completion and the accused has no criminal history. The bail was granted on a bond of ₹50,000 and several conditions including regular police verification and court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court in Bardoli, Surat granted bail to the accused Balbir Ramkhiladi Khatik in Criminal Bail Application No. 188/2026. The accused was charged under IPC Sections 306 and 54 for allegedly committing theft of yarn worth approximately ten lakhs from a storage room in Vadodra village along with co-accused Hansraj Durjan Singh. Although the prosecution argued the case was serious with incriminating evidence, the court found no sufficient reason to keep the accused in judicial custody pending trial, considering the case requires substantial time for completion and the accused has no criminal history. The bail was granted on a bond of ₹50,000 and several conditions including regular police verification and court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts