SAMIUR RAHEMAN MATIUR RAHEMAN vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 187/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1)B. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR190002822026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
187/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
187/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAMIUR RAHEMAN MATIUR RAHEMAN
Adv. M C MISHRA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Court in Surat granted the applicant's petition to modify the bail condition in a BNS Section 306 case, changing the restriction from "not leaving Gujarat State without trial court permission" to "not leaving India without court permission." The court found the modification justified based on the applicant's employment and family obligations in Tamil Nadu, reducing procedural delays while maintaining judicial oversight. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Court in Surat granted the applicant's petition to modify the bail condition in a BNS Section 306 case, changing the restriction from "not leaving Gujarat State without trial court permission" to "not leaving India without court permission." The court found the modification justified based on the applicant's employment and family obligations in Tamil Nadu, reducing procedural delays while maintaining judicial oversight. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts