DIPAKBHAI AMBUBHAI NIKUM vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 186/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR190002802026
Filing Number
186/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
186/2026
Registration Date
03-Mar-2026
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-3rd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 22-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DIPAKBHAI AMBUBHAI NIKUM
Adv. C G SHAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court in Bardoli, Surat granted bail to Dipakbhai Ambubhai Nikum in a Prohibition Act case (Sections 65(e), 81, 98(2), 116(b)) involving foreign liquor contraband worth ₹1,64,016. The court approved bail of ₹50,000 with stringent conditions including regular police reporting, non-interference with evidence, and restrictions on leaving India, applying the parity principle since a co-accused received bail while noting the case required substantial trial time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
3rd Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Order
3rd Addl District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 186/2026
Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court in Bardoli, Surat granted bail to Dipakbhai Ambubhai Nikum in a Prohibition Act case (Sections 65(e), 81, 98(2), 116(b)) involving foreign liquor contraband worth ₹1,64,016. The court approved bail of ₹50,000 with stringent conditions including regular police reporting, non-interference with evidence, and restrictions on leaving India, applying the parity principle since a co-accused received bail while noting the case required substantial trial time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts