DIPAKBHAI AMBUBHAI NIKUM vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 186/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR190002802026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

186/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

186/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(E),81,98(2),116(B)

Petitioner(s)

DIPAKBHAI AMBUBHAI NIKUM

Adv. C G SHAH

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

12-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

ORDER

07-03-2026

ORDER

06-03-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court in Bardoli, Surat granted bail to Dipakbhai Ambubhai Nikum in a Prohibition Act case (Sections 65(e), 81, 98(2), 116(b)) involving foreign liquor contraband worth ₹1,64,016. The court approved bail of ₹50,000 with stringent conditions including regular police reporting, non-interference with evidence, and restrictions on leaving India, applying the parity principle since a co-accused received bail while noting the case required substantial trial time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court in Bardoli, Surat granted bail to Dipakbhai Ambubhai Nikum in a Prohibition Act case (Sections 65(e), 81, 98(2), 116(b)) involving foreign liquor contraband worth ₹1,64,016. The court approved bail of ₹50,000 with stringent conditions including regular police reporting, non-interference with evidence, and restrictions on leaving India, applying the parity principle since a co-accused received bail while noting the case required substantial trial time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case