ANKIT RAMPRAKASH RAMSAJIVAN PANDEY vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 184/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR190002752026

Filing Number

184/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

184/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214023260105

Police Station

KADODARA GIDC POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 352,54,109(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANKIT RAMPRAKASH RAMSAJIVAN PANDEY

    Adv. P I JODHPURIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary: The Additional Sessions Court in Surat granted bail to Ankit Ramprakash Ramajivan Pandey in a criminal case under IPC sections 352, 109(1), and 54. The court found that while the accused was charged with assault and rioting against the complainant, he had a secondary role compared to co-accused, no criminal history, and the victim had recovered. Considering the lengthy trial period ahead and the accused being a permanent resident of Surat, the court approved bail of Rs. 50,000 with conditions including regular police station reporting and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 184/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Court in Surat granted bail to Ankit Ramprakash Ramajivan Pandey in a criminal case under IPC sections 352, 109(1), and 54. The court found that while the accused was charged with assault and rioting against the complainant, he had a secondary role compared to co-accused, no criminal history, and the victim had recovered. Considering the lengthy trial period ahead and the accused being a permanent resident of Surat, the court approved bail of Rs. 50,000 with conditions including regular police station reporting and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case