ANKIT RAMPRAKASH RAMSAJIVAN PANDEY vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 184/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR190002752026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
184/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
184/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214023260105
Police Station
KADODARA GIDC POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANKIT RAMPRAKASH RAMSAJIVAN PANDEY
Adv. P I JODHPURIYA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Sessions Court in Surat granted bail to Ankit Ramprakash Ramajivan Pandey in a criminal case under IPC sections 352, 109(1), and 54. The court found that while the accused was charged with assault and rioting against the complainant, he had a secondary role compared to co-accused, no criminal history, and the victim had recovered. Considering the lengthy trial period ahead and the accused being a permanent resident of Surat, the court approved bail of Rs. 50,000 with conditions including regular police station reporting and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Court in Surat granted bail to Ankit Ramprakash Ramajivan Pandey in a criminal case under IPC sections 352, 109(1), and 54. The court found that while the accused was charged with assault and rioting against the complainant, he had a secondary role compared to co-accused, no criminal history, and the victim had recovered. Considering the lengthy trial period ahead and the accused being a permanent resident of Surat, the court approved bail of Rs. 50,000 with conditions including regular police station reporting and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts