GORAKH BHIMRAV GADARI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 183/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR190002742026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
183/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
183/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GORAKH BHIMRAV GADARI
Adv. P I JODHPURIYA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Gorakh Bhimrao Gadri under CrPC Section 482, filed in a case involving charges under the Prohibition Act (sections 65(a)(i), 81, 83, 98(2), 116(b)) and IPC sections 112(2)(b), 111(3)(4). The court found a prima facie case against the applicant, noting he supplied a substantial quantity of foreign liquor (1,878 bottles worth ₹3,85,480) through his wine shop, demonstrating active involvement in the crime. The court also considered his criminal history, ongoing police investigation requiring custodial interrogation, and risk of re-offending, making him unsuitable for bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Gorakh Bhimrao Gadri under CrPC Section 482, filed in a case involving charges under the Prohibition Act (sections 65(a)(i), 81, 83, 98(2), 116(b)) and IPC sections 112(2)(b), 111(3)(4). The court found a prima facie case against the applicant, noting he supplied a substantial quantity of foreign liquor (1,878 bottles worth ₹3,85,480) through his wine shop, demonstrating active involvement in the crime. The court also considered his criminal history, ongoing police investigation requiring custodial interrogation, and risk of re-offending, making him unsuitable for bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts