RUSHIKESH SATISH NAVGIRE POWER OF ATTORNEY HIREN MANOJBHAI MAHETA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 12/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438,. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJSR190002732026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
12/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
12/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214023232037
Police Station
KADODARA GIDC POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RUSHIKESH SATISH NAVGIRE POWER OF ATTORNEY HIREN MANOJBHAI MAHETA
Adv. P I JODHPURIYA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Surat dismissed the applicant's Criminal Revision Application challenging the trial court's rejection of his request for interim custody of a seized vehicle. The court held that since 297 liters of illegal liquor was recovered from the vehicle—far exceeding the 20-liter threshold under the Prohibition Act—Section 98(2) mandates confiscation, and the vehicle cannot be released pending trial, making the trial court's order legally sound and requiring no interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Surat dismissed the applicant's Criminal Revision Application challenging the trial court's rejection of his request for interim custody of a seized vehicle. The court held that since 297 liters of illegal liquor was recovered from the vehicle—far exceeding the 20-liter threshold under the Prohibition Act—Section 98(2) mandates confiscation, and the vehicle cannot be released pending trial, making the trial court's order legally sound and requiring no interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts