PRUTHAVIRAJ HIRALAL KALAL vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 180/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR190002672026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
180/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
180/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRUTHAVIRAJ HIRALAL KALAL
Adv. C G SHAH
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
HEARING
REPLY OF I.O.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 05-03-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY The Additional Sessions Court, Surat rejected the anticipatory bail application of Prithviraj Hiralal Kalal under Section 482 of the CrPC. The applicant was accused under the Prohibition Act and IPC for allegedly supplying large quantities of foreign liquor (₹5,41,200 worth) to co-accused persons. The court found a prima facie case against the applicant, noted his criminal history, ongoing police investigation requiring custodial interrogation, and the serious nature of the liquor trade offense, making bail denial justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The Additional Sessions Court, Surat rejected the anticipatory bail application of Prithviraj Hiralal Kalal under Section 482 of the CrPC. The applicant was accused under the Prohibition Act and IPC for allegedly supplying large quantities of foreign liquor (₹5,41,200 worth) to co-accused persons. The court found a prima facie case against the applicant, noted his criminal history, ongoing police investigation requiring custodial interrogation, and the serious nature of the liquor trade offense, making bail denial justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts