SAMIR RIYAZUDIN SHEKH vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 178/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR190002652026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
178/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
178/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAMIR RIYAZUDIN SHEKH
Adv. A D BACHCHHAV
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court in Bardoli, Surat granted bail to Samir Riyazuddin Sheikh in Criminal Bail Application No. 178/2026 under Section 483 CrPC. The applicant was charged under IPC Sections 305, 331(4), and Indian Electricity Act Section 136(1)(A)(C) for allegedly stealing aluminum electrical wires worth Rs. 2,00,000. The court found that while serious charges existed, the applicant had no prior criminal history, the investigation was substantially complete (970 kg of 1000 kg stolen wire recovered), and prolonged judicial custody served no purpose. Bail was granted on conditions including a bond of Rs. 50,000, monthly police reporting, and a prohibition against leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court in Bardoli, Surat granted bail to Samir Riyazuddin Sheikh in Criminal Bail Application No. 178/2026 under Section 483 CrPC. The applicant was charged under IPC Sections 305, 331(4), and Indian Electricity Act Section 136(1)(A)(C) for allegedly stealing aluminum electrical wires worth Rs. 2,00,000. The court found that while serious charges existed, the applicant had no prior criminal history, the investigation was substantially complete (970 kg of 1000 kg stolen wire recovered), and prolonged judicial custody served no purpose. Bail was granted on conditions including a bond of Rs. 50,000, monthly police reporting, and a prohibition against leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts