SHABIR MOHAMAD MALEK vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 176/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR190002632026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
176/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
176/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHABIR MOHAMAD MALEK
Adv. A D BACHCHHAV
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Judgment The Additional Sessions Court in Bardoli, Surat, granted bail to accused Shabir Mohammad Malech in Criminal Bail Application No. 176/2026 under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The accused was charged under IPC Sections 305, 331(4), and Electricity Act Section 136(1)(a)(c) for allegedly stealing aluminum wire worth ₹2,00,000 along with co-accused. The court found the charges serious but granted bail on ₹50,000 bond with specific conditions including regular police reporting, court attendance during trial, and restrictions on leaving India without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Judgment The Additional Sessions Court in Bardoli, Surat, granted bail to accused Shabir Mohammad Malech in Criminal Bail Application No. 176/2026 under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The accused was charged under IPC Sections 305, 331(4), and Electricity Act Section 136(1)(a)(c) for allegedly stealing aluminum wire worth ₹2,00,000 along with co-accused. The court found the charges serious but granted bail on ₹50,000 bond with specific conditions including regular police reporting, court attendance during trial, and restrictions on leaving India without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts