SADIKMIYA SAMSUDIN SHEKH vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 173/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR190002602026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

173/2026

Filing Date

28-02-2026

Registration No

173/2026

Registration Date

28-02-2026

Court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 115(2),118(1),352,351(3),54,54,
SCHEDULED CASTS AND THE SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF TROCITIES) ACT, 1989 Section 3(1)R,3(1)S,3(2)5A

Petitioner(s)

SADIKMIYA SAMSUDIN SHEKH

Adv. A S SAIYAD

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

09-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

ORDER

06-03-2026

HEARING

05-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat at Bardoli, rejected the regular bail application of Sadikmiya Samsuddin Shaikh under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023. The court found a prima facie case against the accused for voluntarily beating the complainant with an iron rod, abusing and threatening to kill him, and determined his role was more serious than co-accused who were released on bail. The court rejected arguments that charge-sheet filing and parity principle warranted bail, noting the accused's habitual nature with three other pending cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat at Bardoli, rejected the regular bail application of Sadikmiya Samsuddin Shaikh under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023. The court found a prima facie case against the accused for voluntarily beating the complainant with an iron rod, abusing and threatening to kill him, and determined his role was more serious than co-accused who were released on bail. The court rejected arguments that charge-sheet filing and parity principle warranted bail, noting the accused's habitual nature with three other pending cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case