SADIKMIYA SAMSUDIN SHEKH vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 173/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR190002602026
Filing Number
173/2026
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
173/2026
Registration Date
28-Feb-2026
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
2-5th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 22-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SADIKMIYA SAMSUDIN SHEKH
Adv. A S SAIYAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Judegement
Summary The 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat at Bardoli, rejected the regular bail application of Sadikmiya Samsuddin Shaikh under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023. The court found a prima facie case against the accused for voluntarily beating the complainant with an iron rod, abusing and threatening to kill him, and determined his role was more serious than co-accused who were released on bail. The court rejected arguments that charge-sheet filing and parity principle warranted bail, noting the accused's habitual nature with three other pending cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
5th Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Order
5th Addl District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 173/2026
Summary The 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Surat at Bardoli, rejected the regular bail application of Sadikmiya Samsuddin Shaikh under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023. The court found a prima facie case against the accused for voluntarily beating the complainant with an iron rod, abusing and threatening to kill him, and determined his role was more serious than co-accused who were released on bail. The court rejected arguments that charge-sheet filing and parity principle warranted bail, noting the accused's habitual nature with three other pending cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts