SAHIL PARSHOTAM MAKVANA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 170/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR190002562026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
170/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
170/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAHIL PARSHOTAM MAKVANA
Adv. C B DESAI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Bardoli, Surat granted bail to the accused Sahil Parshottam Makwana in Criminal Bail Application No. 170/2026 under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The accused was charged under IPC Sections 309(6), 3(5), and Gujarat Police Act Section 135 for assault and robbery. While the court found credible evidence against the accused regarding involvement in the incident, it determined that bail was justified given the absence of grave offenses and the extended trial duration, subject to strict conditions including regular police reporting, maintaining residence details, and a five-month monthly reporting requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Bardoli, Surat granted bail to the accused Sahil Parshottam Makwana in Criminal Bail Application No. 170/2026 under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The accused was charged under IPC Sections 309(6), 3(5), and Gujarat Police Act Section 135 for assault and robbery. While the court found credible evidence against the accused regarding involvement in the incident, it determined that bail was justified given the absence of grave offenses and the extended trial duration, subject to strict conditions including regular police reporting, maintaining residence details, and a five-month monthly reporting requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts