SANDIP ALIAS MUKESH MAHANTRAY YADAV vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP, J S PAREKH — 168/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR190002532026

Filing Number

168/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

168/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 22-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137,87,64(2)D,65(1)્
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4,6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANDIP ALIAS MUKESH MAHANTRAY YADAV

    Adv. V N NAYKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor), J S PAREKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Bardoli, Surat rejected the bail application of accused Sandeep (alias Mukesh) Mahantray Yadav, who was charged under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m), 65(1) and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6 for seducing, abducting, and committing repeated sexual offences against a minor girl (15 years, 2 months, 23 days old), resulting in her pregnancy. The court found a prima facie case against the accused and considered the serious nature of offences, risk of witness intimidation, and the victim's vulnerable condition as grounds for denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 168/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Bardoli, Surat rejected the bail application of accused Sandeep (alias Mukesh) Mahantray Yadav, who was charged under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m), 65(1) and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6 for seducing, abducting, and committing repeated sexual offences against a minor girl (15 years, 2 months, 23 days old), resulting in her pregnancy. The court found a prima facie case against the accused and considered the serious nature of offences, risk of witness intimidation, and the victim's vulnerable condition as grounds for denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case