PRIYANSHIKUMARI PRADIPBHAI CHAUDHARI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 167/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSR190002522026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
167/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
167/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214032260174
Police Station
MANDVI POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRIYANSHIKUMARI PRADIPBHAI CHAUDHARI
Adv. P T SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 05-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 03-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Surat rejected the pre-arrest bail application of Priyanshi Pradipbhai Choudhry under Section 482 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The court found a prima facie case against the applicant under IPC sections 140(2), 127(2), 108, and 54, involving allegations of kidnapping, unlawful confinement, and abetting the suicide of a young man, and determined that custodial interrogation was necessary for thorough investigation of this serious matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Surat rejected the pre-arrest bail application of Priyanshi Pradipbhai Choudhry under Section 482 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The court found a prima facie case against the applicant under IPC sections 140(2), 127(2), 108, and 54, involving allegations of kidnapping, unlawful confinement, and abetting the suicide of a young man, and determined that custodial interrogation was necessary for thorough investigation of this serious matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts