RAMESHBHAI NANJIBHAI PADSALA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 154/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1)A. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR190002232026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

154/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

154/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

KADODARA GIDC POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483(1)A
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 304,284,120(B),114,467,471,

Petitioner(s)

RAMESHBHAI NANJIBHAI PADSALA

Adv. P M PARMAR

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

17-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

ORDER

09-03-2026

ORDER

02-03-2026

ORDER

26-02-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court partially allowed the application of Rameshbhai Nanjibhai Padshala, permitting temporary release of his passport (April 15 to May 15, 2026) for renewal and travel abroad from May 2-10, 2026, on condition that he deposits Rs. 1,00,000 with the court, informs authorities of his itinerary, and returns promptly without delaying the trial. The court found the applicant had consistently complied with bail conditions, never breached terms, and posed no flight risk, thus suspending the earlier passport restriction condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court partially allowed the application of Rameshbhai Nanjibhai Padshala, permitting temporary release of his passport (April 15 to May 15, 2026) for renewal and travel abroad from May 2-10, 2026, on condition that he deposits Rs. 1,00,000 with the court, informs authorities of his itinerary, and returns promptly without delaying the trial. The court found the applicant had consistently complied with bail conditions, never breached terms, and posed no flight risk, thus suspending the earlier passport restriction condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case