PATEL AMARATBHAI BECHARBHAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 142/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR190002082026

Filing Number

142/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

142/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214031251349

Police Station

MAHUVA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 Section 6A,6B,8(4),8(1,8(2)),8(3),5
Gujarat (Bombay) Animal Preservation Act, 1954 Section 11(1)F
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 61(2)A,54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PATEL AMARATBHAI BECHARBHAI

    Adv. G S PATHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Third Additional Sessions Judge, Surat (Bardoli) allowed the applicant's petition to withdraw an application for recovery of seized property during the interim period. The court granted permission for withdrawal after the applicant's counsel informed that the police had already auctioned the vehicle, making the application redundant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Third Additional Sessions Judge, Surat (Bardoli) allowed the applicant's petition to withdraw an application for recovery of seized property during the interim period. The court granted permission for withdrawal after the applicant's counsel informed that the police had already auctioned the vehicle, making the application redundant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case